Skip to content
(41) // LARAVEL DEVELOPMENT

Laravel Development Services

Laravel builds, upgrades and rescue work — from a first release to a nine-year-old app nobody wants to touch.

  • [01]

    Greenfield Laravel builds

  • [02]

    Version upgrades to a supported release

  • [03]

    Inherited-codebase audit with a written plan

  • [04]

    Queue, Horizon and scheduler design

  • [05]

    Filament or Nova admin panels

  • [06]

    Pest / PHPUnit suite and PHPStan in CI

  • [07]

    Query profiling and cache strategy

Laravel, specifically

This page is about the framework. If you want the wider picture of how we build server-side systems, that is backend engineering. Laravel is simply the tool we reach for most often. This is what we actually do with it.

We take three kinds of Laravel work: new builds, upgrades, and code someone else wrote.

New builds

A Laravel app that is still pleasant at year three looks different from one that was quick at month one. We keep business rules in plain PHP classes that know nothing about HTTP. The framework does transport: routing, validation, queues, auth. Controllers stay thin enough to read in one screen. Eloquent models stay models rather than becoming a junk drawer of static helpers.

For the interface layer we use Livewire or Inertia, depending on how much of the app is genuinely interactive. We say which at the architecture stage rather than defaulting. Admin panels are usually Filament — building a bespoke CRUD interface for internal users is rarely a good use of your budget.

Upgrades

Most people who email us about Laravel are two or more major versions behind and nervous. The approach is sequencing, not heroics. Get CI green first. Update packages to versions that straddle both releases. Then move one major version at a time, merging and deploying each hop. Deprecations are cleared last, as ordinary maintenance.

The detail, including where PHP version bumps fit and why queue workers are the classic deploy trap, is in Keeping Laravel upgrades boring.

Inherited code

If you have an application and no longer have the team that wrote it, we start with a fixed-price audit rather than a proposal. You get a written assessment. It covers what the architecture actually is, what is risky, what is merely ugly, what the upgrade path costs, and what we would do in the first month. That document is yours whether or not you continue with us.

Operations

Queues with retry semantics you can reason about and Horizon configured so a stuck job is visible rather than silent. Scheduled work that reports its own failures instead of failing quietly at 3am. Static analysis in CI so regressions surface in review. Cache invalidation designed rather than discovered.

Which Laravel versions do you work with?

Current releases for new builds. For upgrades, anything — the older it is, the more the sequencing matters. An application several major versions behind can reach a supported release without a rewrite; it has to be done one hop at a time.

Can you work alongside our developers?

Yes, and it is the common case. We leave the codebase more readable than we found it and write the architectural decisions down for whoever stays.

Do you do Laravel maintenance retainers?

Yes. Usually a fixed number of days a month covering dependency updates, security patches and small features, with anything larger quoted separately.

Is Laravel the right choice for our project?

Often, not always. It is an excellent fit for business applications, SaaS products and anything with a lot of domain logic. For a realtime-heavy product or a mostly static site we would suggest something else and explain why. The recommendation comes before the invoice.

Laravel 12PHP 8.4LivewireInertiaFilamentHorizonPestPHPStanMySQLPostgreSQLRedis
START A
PROJECT
EMAIL CHANNELHELLO@BEECODEX.COM
SYSTEMS ONLINE / TAKING NEW PROJECTS